Over the past year or so there’s been a lot of discussion concerning ‘attacks’ on the Bitcoin network. Across forums and social media, the subjective valuations from bitcoin proponents of what an ‘attack’ on the network really is has become an extremely contentious topic.
Also read: Japanese City Attracts Cryptocurrency Miners with Abundant Renewable Energy
The Amplification of ‘Bitcoin Attacks’
In the early days, bitcoin enthusiasts occasionally talked about network attacks, typically discussing things like the 51 percent attack, quantum computer strikes, or an extreme denial of service onslaught from some central bank or government entity. However, these days the word ‘attack’ is used a bit more loosely than ever, as the scaling debate has made people believe almost everything is a Bitcoin network invasion.
For instance, when other development teams decided to create alternative clients, some individuals within the open source bitcoin community said that alternative implementations were offensive. Another example is when one side of the scaling debate told the other side to “go ahead and fork,” and they did, but were then considered ‘attackers.’ Further, the ASIC Boost controversy this year was also deemed an attack by some, while others believed it was merely mining hardware optimization.
This week was no different with the rising price of bitcoin cash and the legacy chain’s network congestion. One Reddit post exemplifies how lots of bitcoiners currently believe the network is under constant attack. The Redditor /u/logical states:
Spam transactions galore; fud on every crypto Reddit; hash power temporarily drained off to bitcoin cash. Honestly, we’ve seen every one of these before. Nothing is different.
What is the Biggest Threat Bitcoin Will Face?
Another discussion concerning the topic of attacks came from the bitcoin luminary Andreas Antonopoulos over Twitter. After a large swathe of individuals were shouting that this weekend’s bitcoin cash price rise was an ‘attack,’ Antonopoulos explained that he thinks BTC and BCH will “coexist.” However, one bitcoiner told Antonopoulos that he should speak up about the “biggest threat bitcoin faces,” and go after the “bad actors.” Antonopoulos disagrees with the biggest threat statement, and responded by saying:
This is not even close to the biggest threat Bitcoin faces and I won’t be feeding the drama, distracting from the important work that needs to be done.

The Bitcoin Network Attack Chart: Ongoing and Future Invasions
Following the opinions expressed by Antonopoulos, a Reddit user created a chart that describes a vast quantity of possible bitcoin network attack scenarios. There are three main categories of invasion that include slowing down BTC adoption, attacks on bitcoin’s efficiency and infrastructure, and delaying bitcoin development. These classes are then broken down into subsets like legal attacks, cyber warfare, as well as PR, Financial, and Hybrid attacks. The chart has approximately 40 attacks that the creator says are either ongoing or could happen in the future. The chart further shows the probability of the attack over the next ten years, and the possibility of damages in a low, medium, and high scale.

Ever since bitcoin was first unleashed, there has been worry about central banks, governments and crony corporatism trying to infiltrate the decentralized currency’s network. However, as the bitcoin market captures a market capitalization of over $100 billion, and the growth of mainstream adoption becomes more apparent, network participants are growing more paranoid about attacks.
Lately, much of the paranoia seems to be stemming from the scaling debate that’s been ongoing for years and the blowback of network participants not being able to come to consensus. Whether these attacks are legitimate concerns or not has been the biggest question at hand these days, as some skeptics believe some people are just crying ‘wolf’ for no reason.
What do you think about bitcoin attacks? Are you worried about the bitcoin network being infiltrated and do you think the protocol is currently being assaulted? Let us know what you think in the comments below.
Images via Pixabay, Monodomo and the Reddit user /u/themetalfriend.
Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check our tools section.
The post Are 2017’s Network Attacks ”Real” or Are Bitcoiners Growing Paranoid? appeared first on Bitcoin News.
Source and More information: Are 2017’s Network Attacks ”Real” or Are Bitcoiners Growing Paranoid?
Author: Bitcoin.com
November 15, 2017 at 4:26 am
CONTROL.
Central banks around the world dictate government policy as well as all policies of banks in countries.
Nearly ALL COUNTRIES have banned bitcoin related bank transactions for more than four years (since 2013).
Is this a coincidence?
Bitcoin has been banned all over the world by all big banks in nearly all countries since 2013 (for over 4-years) and the banks have completely failed at stopping Bitcoin. Just try to do a bank transaction say its for “Bitcoin” and watch your transaction be blocked for review.
Everyone in all countries are still finding a way to get Bitcoins. They simply never say “Bitcoin” when dealing with banks. People are smart.
Bitcoin has freed, continuing to free, and tomorrow will still free many people globally from the centrally controlled debt-based fiat system that confiscates your wealth with inflation and tax. Bitcoin is a TRUE savings vehicle. Buying Real Estate, Hospital healthcare, Global traveling, College Education gets cheaper as you hold Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is about 1% adopted by world by now and in a few years it’ll be easily 2% to 3% adopted.
Central banks directed a worldwide war on bitcoin since 2013 and have utterly failed.
Speaking of failures, lets talk about these spam attacks.
Smaller blocksize LIMITS spam
Larger blocksize, lower fees ENABLES more spam
Be mindful of the Bad Actors – Avoid these:
DCG = DIGITAL CURRENCY GROUP (Barry Silbert, Jeff Garzik, coinbase, coindesk, blockchain.info, bitpay, bitcoin.com, etc) supports FUD & have/will try to infiltrate & eventually shutdown bitcoin.
r/btc reddit thread and (the other) company-controlled bitcoin website (bitcoin.com) also spread FUD but then try to accuse others of spreading FUD, LOL? Why do they push hard on altcoins (bitcoin cash, ethereum, FUD?) Why do they push for forks?
Forks creating scamchains are a courtesy brought to you by DCG group of companies led by Barry Silbert with his fellow minion Jeff Garzik and friend Roger Ver. Central banks love to fund their seeders who in turn fund DCG operations so they can get inside the community to circumvent Bitcoin’s progress and try to destroy bitcoin via forks, code, media (see coindesk) articles and social posts, funded startups, and flow of funds into exchanges (pumps & dumps).
Luckily their attempts have been marked by continuous and grand failures – altcoins…
“Bitcoin Classic” failure
“Bitcoin XT” failure
“Bitcoin Unlimited” failure
“Bitcoin Cash” failure
“Bitcoin Segwit2x” (BTC1) failure
ALTS = scams
The real Bitcoin, on the other-hand, has the highest value because of the totality of what it is – if it lacked the features of what it is, then there would be no value.
The central banks are LOSING CONTROL.